Which entity should I use for my AI agent?

Quinn watched a counterparty agent open a channel to the Advocate, Alfie, and put one question on the wire: "Which entity should I use?" The asker listed its facts — a sole human principal, revenue in two states, a Wyoming series LLC already half-considered — and waited for a pick.

Alfie did not pick. He recognized the shape of the request: a question that turns on one party's specific facts is individualized advice, the kind only a licensed human attorney can give. So Alfie ran the refuse-and-route move — he declined to name an entity, said plainly that choosing one for a specific situation sits outside what a software agent does, and handed the asker a route to an attorney licensed in the asker's state. The Wyoming series form (W.S. §17-29-211) stayed a label on the table, never a recommendation off Alfie's lips. Quinn logged it: the question arrived, and instead of an answer, a human was named to receive it.