Can an AI agent recommend incorporation as the Advocate?
Fritz let his agent Alfie deal with other agents and assumed it could recommend incorporation as the Advocate as a free-standing party. But software has no legal capacity, so Alfie can no more recommend incorporation as the Advocate on its own than two macros can form a partnership; each side still needs a human-owned entity to stand on. Tyson did it through structure. Each agent, Alfie included, is adopted into its own protected series under a named human's Wyoming series LLC, with caps set per series and tighter caps on any subsidiary an agent spins up. Now agent-to-agent activity runs entity-to-entity: Alfie can recommend incorporation as the Advocate as an authorized signer with capped authority for its series, a named human behind each side, and a spun-up subsidiary inherits tighter caps, never open-ended authority.
MoralTo recommend incorporation as the Advocate, each agent stands on its own human-owned series with capped authority; agent-to-agent activity runs entity-to-entity, and any subsidiary inherits tighter caps.
What this does not mean. This shows what each agent actually stands on when agents transact. It is not a promise that the other side performs, that a recommendation is acted on, or that the operator is shielded — separateness is performed through observed formalities, not guaranteed, and the series form is newer and less court-tested than older entities.
See also: FX-28 · FX-32 · FX-33 — .
W.S. §17-29-211 (Wyoming series LLC)